Reported by Guardian — US •
65 Outlet-flavored L R Leans left ✓ verified
Why this rating? · 9 signals

Signals flagged in the original

  • loaded language: 'rightwing campaign'
  • loaded language: 'discredit'
  • loaded language: 'bias'
  • loaded language: 'sway the judiciary'
  • framing: headline asserting a conclusion
  • framing: selective emphasis on rightwing
  • editorializing: it is actually fossil fuel-backed organizations that are attempting to sway the judiciary in their favor
  • vague attribution: rightwing organizations are attempting, they claim, one of those law firms is countering

Analyzed by our bias model Full breakdown ↓

Campaigns Influence US Judges' Perspectives on Climate Litigation

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright has been linked to seminars for judges during his time as a fracking executive. Amid lawsuits against oil companies for alleged product risks, rightwing groups claim that environmental lawyers are biasing judges, while a law firm counters that fossil fuel interests are the ones attempting to sway judicial perspectives.

Companies
oil
People
Chris Wright

Our neutral summary

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright has been linked to seminars for judges during his time as a fracking executive. Amid lawsuits against oil companies for alleged product risks, rightwing groups claim that environmental lawyers are biasing judges, while a law firm counters that fossil fuel interests are the ones attempting to sway judicial perspectives.

Read the full story at Guardian — US

The reporting belongs to Guardian — US; we don't reproduce it.

Annotating as

No note attached

on this article.

Language Analysis

Loaded-language score 65/100
wirepublicmainstream flavoredpartisanadvocacy
Inflammatory language 38/100

Loaded Language Removed

  • ✕ loaded language: 'rightwing campaign'
  • ✕ loaded language: 'discredit'
  • ✕ loaded language: 'bias'
  • ✕ loaded language: 'sway the judiciary'
  • ✕ framing: headline asserting a conclusion
  • ✕ framing: selective emphasis on rightwing
  • ✕ editorializing: it is actually fossil fuel-backed organizations that are attempting to sway the judiciary in their favor
  • ✕ vague attribution: rightwing organizations are attempting, they claim, one of those law firms is countering
  • ✕ omitted response: a named/criticized party is given no chance to respond

Original vs. Neutral

Original Headline

The rightwing campaign to control how US judges view the climate crisis

Neutral Headline

Campaigns Influence US Judges' Perspectives on Climate Litigation