Reported by nbcnews.com •
65 Outlet-flavored L R Leans left ✓ verified
Why this rating? · 9 signals

Signals flagged in the original

  • loaded language: 'controversial'
  • loaded language: 'illegal slush fund'
  • loaded language: 'attacking American democracy'
  • loaded language: 'reward Jan. 6 insurrectionists'
  • framing: headline asserting a conclusion
  • framing: selective emphasis on Democratic proposals and criticisms
  • editorializing: President Donald Trump should not be using 'your tax dollars' to reward Jan. 6 insurrectionists
  • editorializing: money you got for attacking American democracy is fully taxable

Analyzed by our bias model Full breakdown ↓

New York Lawmaker Proposes 100% Tax on Funds from Controversial Federal Program

New York Assemblyman Alex Bores has introduced a bill to tax 100% of funds received by residents from the federal 'anti-weaponization' fund, which he labels an 'illegal slush fund.' The proposal aims to prevent individuals involved in the January 6 insurrection from benefiting financially from the fund, which has drawn bipartisan criticism.

People
Alex Bores Donald Trump Gavin Newsom Jimmy Panetta JD Vance

Our neutral summary

New York Assemblyman Alex Bores has introduced a bill to tax 100% of funds received by residents from the federal 'anti-weaponization' fund, which he labels an 'illegal slush fund.' The proposal aims to prevent individuals involved in the January 6 insurrection from benefiting financially from the fund, which has drawn bipartisan criticism.

Read the full story at nbcnews.com

The reporting belongs to nbcnews.com; we don't reproduce it.

Annotating as

No note attached

on this article.

Language Analysis

Loaded-language score 65/100
wirepublicmainstream flavoredpartisanadvocacy
Inflammatory language 5/100
Sentiment -20/100

Loaded Language Removed

  • ✕ loaded language: 'controversial'
  • ✕ loaded language: 'illegal slush fund'
  • ✕ loaded language: 'attacking American democracy'
  • ✕ loaded language: 'reward Jan. 6 insurrectionists'
  • ✕ framing: headline asserting a conclusion
  • ✕ framing: selective emphasis on Democratic proposals and criticisms
  • ✕ editorializing: President Donald Trump should not be using 'your tax dollars' to reward Jan. 6 insurrectionists
  • ✕ editorializing: money you got for attacking American democracy is fully taxable
  • ✕ vague attribution: bipartisan criticism, bipartisan opposition

Original vs. Neutral

Original Headline

Proposed bill would tax New Yorkers who tap ‘anti-weaponization’ fund at 100%

Neutral Headline

New York Lawmaker Proposes 100% Tax on Funds from Controversial Federal Program