AI-Debiased Article
Rewritten from TechCrunch 1 min read
14 Public broadcaster provisional
Why this rating? · 1 signal

Signals flagged in the original

  • loaded language: 'controversial'

Provisional estimate — refines shortly Full breakdown ↓

Authors Raise Concerns Over Claims on Anthropic Settlement Payments

Authors are expressing concerns over claims made by publishers and agents on payments from Anthropic's $1.5 billion copyright settlement. The settlement, which compensates authors for pirated works, has led to confusion regarding payment allocations, with some publishers claiming payments for works they no longer hold rights to. The Authors Guild has provided guidance for authors on disputing these claims.

Companies
Anthropic
People
April Henry Victoria Strauss Mary Rasenberger Courtney Milan

Some authors expecting to receive payments from Anthropic’s $1.5 billion copyright settlement reported receiving emails indicating that others were making claims on their payments. Anthropic settled a copyright class action suit last year after a judge ruled that training AI models on copyrighted material is legal under fair use doctrine, while pirating that material is not. The settlement received final approval in July, allowing payments to proceed. Under the settlement terms, authors of nearly 500,000 titles will receive $3,000 for each pirated work. If the book is still in print with a traditional publisher, the payment will be split 50-50 between the author and publisher. If the book was self-published or if the publisher reverted the rights by allowing the book to go out of print, the author is entitled to the full payment. Authors have taken to social media to express concerns that publishers are claiming more than their fair share of some payments. For instance, author April Henry questioned HarperCollins' claim on one of her books that reverted back 17 years ago. Victoria Strauss of the blog Writers Beware noted that she has received complaints from authors regarding publishers seeking payments for works they no longer have a legitimate claim on and others seeking full payments when only entitled to half. Strauss suggested that these issues may stem from poor recordkeeping rather than malice. Authors Guild CEO Mary Rasenberger stated that she does not view this as a publisher grab but rather a result of confusing settlement processes. Strauss also mentioned that complaints have surfaced regarding literary agencies making claims on the payments, which is unexpected since agents are not considered rightsholders. Author Courtney Milan criticized agents attempting to claim percentages from the settlement. The Authors Guild provided details on how authors can dispute payment allocations, noting the importance of the rights reversion date for claims. The rights to a specific book must have reverted before August 10, 2022, to make a 100% claim on it.

Annotating as

No note attached

on this article.

Language Analysis

Loaded-language score 14/100
wirepublicmainstream flavoredpartisanadvocacy
Inflammatory language 2/100

Loaded Language Removed

  • loaded language: 'controversial'

Original vs. Neutral

Original Headline

Authors push back as publishers and agents make claims on Anthropic settlement

Neutral Headline

Authors Raise Concerns Over Claims on Anthropic Settlement Payments