Swiss Voters Reject Proposal to Strengthen Neutrality in Referendum

GENEVA (AP) — Voters in Switzerland overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to strengthen the country's neutrality, which was championed by the Swiss People's Party. This party includes members with pro-Russia leanings and argued that the government had aligned too closely with the European Union and NATO, particularly in light of Russia's war in Ukraine. Final results from the Swiss government indicated that 70% of voters, and a majority in all 26 regions, rejected the proposal. The measure would have prohibited Switzerland from joining punitive actions against other countries unless those actions were mandated by the United Nations. Russia, as a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, holds veto power over such measures. This vote was part of the latest round of Swiss referendums on various local and national issues. Under Switzerland's direct democracy system, voters typically participate in referendums four times a year to influence government policy. The proposal arose following Switzerland's decision to implement EU sanctions against Russia. Swiss neutrality has been part of the constitution since the mid-19th century, but its interpretation has been debated over the years. The country does not belong to any military alliance, and the proposal would have restricted the government from cooperating with alliances like NATO, which it has done for three decades, except in cases of direct threat. Supporters of the proposal claimed that the government has moved too close to the EU and NATO, potentially jeopardizing Switzerland's security and independence. Opponents contended that the federal government already possesses sufficient authority to safeguard national interests. Security concerns played a significant role in influencing voters on both sides. Ruth Bolomey, a 65-year-old retiree from Hawaii, expressed her support for the initiative, stating, "I believe we need neutrality and should keep neutrality for security reasons — for the people." In contrast, 78-year-old New York native Jihad Azkoul voted against the proposal, questioning what would happen if Russia were to attack Switzerland and whether the country would receive protection from its neighbors. He noted, "(They) probably would, but just to be sure."