Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has initiated a legal challenge against Thames Valley Police (TVP) and the Old Bailey concerning searches of his residences in Windsor and Sandringham related to Jeffrey Epstein. The former prince has filed a judicial review claim, which is understood to question the legality of the search warrants issued for these searches. The case is set to commence on Thursday, according to a statement from the police.
In February, police searched Andrew's property at Marsh Farm in Norfolk, where he was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in a public office. Prior reports suggested that Andrew had shared sensitive information with Epstein. He is seeking a judicial review to determine whether the police's actions in raiding his residences were lawful.
A spokesperson for TVP stated, 'Whilst our investigation into misconduct in public office continues, we are engaged in legal proceedings in relation to warrants previously obtained from the Central Criminal Court. As these legal proceedings are currently ongoing, it would be inappropriate for us to comment further.'
The judicial review proceedings are expected to be conducted privately, with Mr. Justice Hilliard presiding over the case. This legal action marks the first time in nearly 400 years that a royal has challenged the legality of criminal proceedings, the last being the trial of Charles I in 1649.
Andrew's arrest, which occurred on his 66th birthday, was the first of a British royal in over 350 years. Following his arrest, he spent 11 hours in police custody and was released under investigation. The police executed searches at both the Sandringham Estate and Royal Lodge, where Andrew had resided for 22 years.
Reports indicate that Andrew's legal team is arguing that the searches were unlawful, with a High Court judge recently granting an application related to this matter. The specifics of Andrew's claim and the alleged unlawful actions by TVP and the Old Bailey have not been disclosed.
Andrew served as the UK's special representative for international trade and investment from 2001 until 2011, resigning amid controversy over his connections to Epstein. Allegations have surfaced that he may have shared confidential information with Epstein regarding his official duties, including reports on visits to various countries and investment opportunities in Afghanistan.
In May, it was reported that detectives investigating Andrew could consider allegations of sexual misconduct as part of their inquiry into potential offenses.