✓ AI-Debiased Article
Rewritten from BBC — Business • • 1 min read
25 Public broadcaster L R No clear lean ✓ verified
Why this rating? · 10 signals

Signals flagged in the original

  • loaded language: 'rank smells'
  • loaded language: 'raising a stink'
  • loaded language: 'making day-to-day life miserable'
  • loaded language: 'stinky facilities'
  • loaded language: 'industrial pongs'
  • loaded language: 'stinkiest'
  • framing: The headline uses a conversational, solution-oriented question.
  • framing: The article repeatedly uses humorous and vivid smell-related language, emphasizing residents' discomfort and technological remedies.

Analyzed by our bias model Full breakdown ↓

Milpitas Landfill Operators Ordered to Address Odours Using Technology

Operators of the Newby Island landfill in Milpitas, California, have been ordered to implement technology to address persistent odours affecting local residents. The use of drones and monitors will help track the chemicals responsible for the smells. Similar issues are reported in other communities, with varying degrees of regulatory oversight and technological solutions being employed to manage industrial odours.

Companies
Newby Island landfill Smithfield Foods Kunak
People
Chia-Ling Kong Micheal Bull Dalton Jacobus Carlos Diaz Claudia Barrios Obregón

The operators of Newby Island landfill in Milpitas, California, have been ordered to take action to address odours emanating from the site. Residents have reported unpleasant smells for decades, with engineer Chia-Ling Kong stating that she has experienced 'two or three hours of bad smells a day.' Local authorities have mandated the use of drones and monitors to track and measure the chemicals responsible for the odours and to automate the collection of landfill gases. Kong expressed optimism that continuous monitoring will help identify problems promptly.

The landfill operators have stated their commitment to safe operations and air quality protection. Similar complaints about odours are being raised in communities worldwide, often linked to landfills, sewage treatment plants, or factories. Many countries lack regulations for managing odours, leaving it to local governments to address the issue. Urban sprawl has brought communities closer to these facilities, increasing the demand for technologies to monitor and prevent odours.

Odour consultant Micheal Bull noted that developments are being built nearer to odorous processes as land becomes more valuable. Technologies to tackle industrial odours generally absorb, convert, or burn them away. Experts claim that effective technologies can remove over 90% of the compounds responsible for smells, although cheaper alternatives, such as deodorisers, may be less effective.

In Des Moines, Iowa, residents have complained about a persistent odour known as the Eastside Funk. A study revealed that several industrial meat companies were contributing to the problem. The city authorities have invested approximately $240,000 annually in technology to monitor odours, allowing them to identify the sources of complaints accurately. Smithfield Foods, one of the companies involved, has invested $2 million in odour control systems but maintains it is not the source of odour complaints.

Currently, cities often rely on human panels to assess odours, a method that may not be realistic. The Spanish company Kunak has developed electronic noses to assist in odour detection. However, the subjective nature of odour perception makes it challenging to satisfy all residents, as sensitivity to odours can vary significantly.

Annotating as

No note attached

on this article.

Language Analysis

Loaded-language score 25/100
wirepublicmainstream flavoredpartisanadvocacy
Inflammatory language 10/100

Loaded Language Removed

  • ✕ loaded language: 'rank smells'
  • ✕ loaded language: 'raising a stink'
  • ✕ loaded language: 'making day-to-day life miserable'
  • ✕ loaded language: 'stinky facilities'
  • ✕ loaded language: 'industrial pongs'
  • ✕ loaded language: 'stinkiest'
  • ✕ framing: The headline uses a conversational, solution-oriented question.
  • ✕ framing: The article repeatedly uses humorous and vivid smell-related language, emphasizing residents' discomfort and technological remedies.
  • ✕ editorializing: In some places at least, technology is making a real difference.
  • ✕ vague attribution: Experts on fixing industrial odours say, Odour experts contacted for this article

Original vs. Neutral

Original Headline

Living with a stink? Technology might help

Neutral Headline

Milpitas Landfill Operators Ordered to Address Odours Using Technology