The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear cases on December 2 concerning the legality of assault weapons bans in Cook County, Illinois, and Connecticut. Local governments argue that AR-15s are dangerous and should be banned, while pro-gun groups maintain that such bans violate the Second Amendment. The Trump administration has expressed support for the pro-gun stance, claiming the bans are unconstitutional. A ruling is expected by the end of June.
Key facts
- The Supreme Court will hear Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins on December 2.
- Cook County and Connecticut argue AR-15s are not ordinary firearms and pose significant dangers.
- Cook County State’s Attorney Eileen O’Neill Burke stated that the Framers did not intend for unrestricted weapon possession.
- Elizabeth Prelogar emphasized the AR-15's capacity for rapid, fatal injuries in her brief.
- The Trump administration supports the pro-gun groups in arguing the bans are unconstitutional.
A short AI summary in our own words. The reporting belongs to Washington Examiner; we don't reproduce it.