Retired Army General Jack Keane expressed skepticism regarding the trustworthiness of Pakistan, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia in negotiations with Iran. During a Monday appearance on Fox News, Keane accused these regional partners of diverting President Donald Trump's focus from military pressure on Iran, leaving the United States and Israel to confront Tehran's actions. Keane described Pakistan and Qatar as 'compromised' mediators, suggesting they favor Iran over U.S. interests. He stated, 'It is well known in the Middle East region, by our intelligence services, by all the players, that the Pakistanis and the Qataris are compromised because they favor Iran at the expense of the United States.'
Keane's comments contrast with Trump's previous praise for Pakistan, noting that the country has been involved in advancing negotiations with Iran. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly defended the administration's partnerships, stating that Trump values relationships with leaders from Pakistan, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia.
Mediators are reportedly preparing a second memorandum focused on the Strait of Hormuz, which may separate the maritime crisis from broader nuclear discussions. Keane criticized the involvement of these countries, claiming it may have led to misunderstandings regarding Iran's intentions.
Pakistan and Qatar have been involved in the diplomatic process, with a joint statement indicating their role in mediating talks under the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding. Raza Rumi, editor-at-large of Pakistan’s The Friday Times, countered Keane’s claims, suggesting that Pakistan's relationship with Iran does not compromise its mediation role.
Keane also directed criticism at Saudi Arabia, alleging that the Kingdom has restricted U.S. military options in the region. He argued that Saudi leaders are unwilling to confront Iran directly, instead preferring to rely on U.S. and Israeli military actions.
The discussion highlights differing perspectives among Gulf states regarding how to handle Iranian aggression, with some favoring diplomatic approaches while others advocate for stronger pressure on Iran. As negotiations continue, the effectiveness of these diplomatic efforts remains uncertain.